http://designsadvice.com/forums/ Designs Advice Tag: javascript en Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:13:53 +0000 http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-206 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:43:30 +0000 annebach 206@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>With both libraries functioning well, my own decision came down<br /> to the fact that the jQuery team tends to take into consideration the thoughts and concerns of design/development communities who would like the major js libraries to function well TOGETHER if ever the need arise, while the developers of Mootools have a very pronounced leaning in favor of an exclusive/proprietary library.</p> <p>Since both function well, I feel it's clearly best to adopt the library that at least TRIES to play nice with others.</p> <p>I find that jQuery is a very community focused project while Mootools is a strictly Mootools focused project. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/modalbox-user-friendly-popups-and-wizards#post-130 Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:12:05 +0000 2dcandy 130@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>nice1 thanks </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/modalbox-user-friendly-popups-and-wizards#post-129 Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:44:58 +0000 idesign 129@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>This might be a useful resource for some people.</p> <blockquote><p>ModalBox is a JavaScript technique for creating modern (Web 2.0-style) modal dialogs or even wizards (sequences of dialogs) without using conventional popups and page reloads. It's inspired by Mac OS X modal dialogs. And yes, it may also be useful for showing bigger versions of images. :)</p> <p>ModalBox is built with pure JavaScript and is based on Sam Stephenson's excellent Prototype JavaScript Framework, script.aculo.us and valid XHTML/CSS. ModalBox uses AJAX to load content. </p></blockquote> <p><a href="http://wildbit.com/demos/modalbox/" rel="nofollow">http://wildbit.com/demos/modalbox/</a> </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-94 Tue, 29 May 2007 07:54:40 +0000 drew 94@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Best thing you can do is experiment with both and even throw in some of the others (YUI, Dojo, Mochi) and see which style fits you best. The benefits of using one over the other are going to vary differently for different people and different projects.</p> <p>Once you play around with the different libraries out there. I believe you will find jQuery to be more oriented at making your life much easier when having to muck about with the DOM and your typical daily tasks as a web developer. Once you start to really dig into jQuery you will find that the code you write on top of jQuery is extremely small and packs a large punch. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-92 Tue, 29 May 2007 01:16:32 +0000 twofivethreetwo 92@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Just like most everything else it depends on you. You can search Google and find tons of people debating which is the best and each claim the one they use is the best. So, browse around all of them. Here is a discussion at 9rules about it as well; <a href="http://9rules.com/programming/notes/2156/" rel="nofollow">http://9rules.com/programming/notes/2156/</a> </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-89 Mon, 28 May 2007 17:47:53 +0000 idesign 89@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>What do you all think would be the best library to adopt? I guess the main use initially would be for effects and form verification. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/scriptaculous-dom-builder-classname#post-24 Wed, 16 May 2007 19:57:31 +0000 idesign 24@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>heres a snippet of code<br /> <code><br /> element = Builder.node('div',{id:'newProjPanel'+String(projNum),className:'projectPanelcss',style:'display:none;width:85%;margin:4px 0 4px 0;padding:5px;background-color:#EEE;position:relative;'},[<br /> Builder.node('a',{onclick:"Effect.SlideUp('newProjPanel"+String(projNum)+"',{duration:0.5,afterFinish: deleteElements});",style:'z-index:'+String(projNum+1)+';position:absolute;top:0;right:0;'},[<br /> Builder.node('img',{src:'images/delete.gif'})<br /> ])]);<br /> </code> </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/scriptaculous-dom-builder-classname#post-23 Wed, 16 May 2007 19:56:51 +0000 idesign 23@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Yeah, it's not getting applied. I don't know why. Rackn' my brain. I'll try looking into it tomorrow I guess. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/scriptaculous-dom-builder-classname#post-22 Wed, 16 May 2007 19:56:30 +0000 blackstudio 22@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Yes the css styles should be getting applied to those elements. I haven't used the Dom builder before, but I have dynamicaly created html elements using javascript and the styles are always applied. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/scriptaculous-dom-builder-classname#post-21 Wed, 16 May 2007 19:55:39 +0000 idesign 21@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Anyone use Script.aculo.us Dom Builder before. I'm having problems with the className attribute. It's supposed to assign a class to the element you are creating with the Dom builder, which it does (FireFox's dom inspector proves it). But the css style with that class name does not get applied. Do css styles get applied to dynamically created elements? </p>