<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Designs Advice Tag: jquery</title>
<link>http://designsadvice.com/forums/</link>
<description>Designs Advice Tag: jquery</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:29:18 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>annebach on "mootools jquery spry or script.aculo.us"</title>
<link>http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-206</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>annebach</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">206@http://designsadvice.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;With both libraries functioning well, my own decision came down&#60;br /&#62;
to the fact that the jQuery team tends to take into consideration the thoughts and concerns of design/development communities who would like the major js libraries to function well TOGETHER if ever the need arise, while the developers of Mootools have a very pronounced leaning in favor of an exclusive/proprietary library.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Since both function well, I feel it's clearly best to adopt the library that at least TRIES to play nice with others.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I find that jQuery is a very community focused project while Mootools is a strictly Mootools focused project.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>drew on "mootools jquery spry or script.aculo.us"</title>
<link>http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-94</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 07:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94@http://designsadvice.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Best thing you can do is experiment with both and even throw in some of the others (YUI, Dojo, Mochi) and see which style fits you best. The benefits of using one over the other are going to vary differently for different people and different projects.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Once you play around with the different libraries out there. I believe you will find jQuery to be more oriented at making your life much easier when having to muck about with the DOM and your typical daily tasks as a web developer. Once you start to really dig into jQuery you will find that the code you write on top of jQuery is extremely small and packs a large punch.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>twofivethreetwo on "mootools jquery spry or script.aculo.us"</title>
<link>http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-92</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 01:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>twofivethreetwo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92@http://designsadvice.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Just like most everything else it depends on you. You can search Google and find tons of people debating which is the best and each claim the one they use is the best. So, browse around all of them. Here is a discussion at 9rules about it as well; &#60;a href=&#34;http://9rules.com/programming/notes/2156/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://9rules.com/programming/notes/2156/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>idesign on "mootools jquery spry or script.aculo.us"</title>
<link>http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/mootools-jquery-spry-or-scriptaculous#post-89</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>idesign</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">89@http://designsadvice.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;What do you all think would be the best library to adopt? I guess the main use initially would be for effects and form verification.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
