http://designsadvice.com/forums/ Designs Advice Tag: seo en Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:57:53 +0000 http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/google-supplemental-results#post-138 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:20:53 +0000 2dcandy 138@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <ul> <li>Do your pages contain a significant amounts of similar content (i.e. the HTML for the page template, does that make up say 90% of your HTML)?</li> <li> Are the page &lt;title&gt; tags unique to each page?</li> <li> Are your Meta Description tags unique to each page?</li> </ul> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/google-supplemental-results#post-137 Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:08:50 +0000 idesign 137@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Is your sitemap absolutely essential? If not then I would suggest that you remove it. If you don't benefit from it in anyway, there is not much reason in creating one in the first place. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/google-supplemental-results#post-136 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:05:37 +0000 fatboyjim 136@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p><a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001545.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobook.com/archives/001545.shtml</a> </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/google-supplemental-results#post-135 Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:59:07 +0000 blackstudio 135@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>The front page of the site has a list of links to all areas, even dynamically generated pages. I have also generated a google XML sitemap that is in the root directory, and submitted to google using the webmaster tools.</p> <p>Over the last few weeks since submitting the sitemap, most of my pages are being listed as supplemental results in googles SERP's.</p> <p>Is this be because I have both links to all areas in the index page and then these same links in the sitemap? </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/dash-or-underscore#post-43 Thu, 17 May 2007 18:49:17 +0000 2dcandy 43@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>it depends what you're urls look like and whether the keywords are worth the effort involved.</p> <p>SE's (google anyway) see words seperated by an underscore as one word. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/dash-or-underscore#post-37 Thu, 17 May 2007 09:23:11 +0000 twofivethreetwo 37@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>Honestly I don't really know the difference in dash vs underscore, I personally use underscores alot in my coding scripts and sites. However, while searching Google I found this article that says its best to use dashes when it comes to Search Engines.</p> <p>I'm sure there are more resources on this topic. </p> http://designsadvice.com/forums/topic/dash-or-underscore#post-34 Thu, 17 May 2007 00:01:46 +0000 sloeg 34@http://designsadvice.com/forums/ <p>My understanding is this: Dash &gt; underscore in URLs because underscores are hard to see in underlined links and SEs see dashes as spaces.</p> <p>If this is true, what do they see underscores as?</p> <p>I ask because I'm doing something right now that automatically uses underscores and not dashes (I don't think I can change it unless there's some funky thing with mod_rewrite).</p> <p>Is it worth finding a solution to remove the underscores and use dashes instead? </p>